Search for: "People v. Stock"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2010, 12:49 pm
For the People Theatres of NY, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 7:01 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 5:15 pm
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:32 am
The damage to our jurisprudence is far greater than most people yet realize. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 1:07 pm
Indeed, these laws were reactions against the Supreme Court's 1990 ruling in Employment Division v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:44 am
The case is Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:55 am
Here’s the Blog of Legal Times’ report on oral arguments in Bahlul v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Tags: Antitrust, CFIUS, Cross-border transactions, Disclosure, Distressed companies, International governance, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, Taxation Corporations are People Too (And They Should Act Like It) Posted by Kent Greenfield (Boston College), on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 … [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 9:19 am
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:08 am
Against this backdrop, the application of § 319b will be examined (V.). [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 12:34 pm
The big case was Snyder v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:36 pm
If you are like most people, you are hearing of it for the first time right now. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:04 am
.
Visit Legal Technology
Stock Option Scandals Take Down a Record Number of GCs
Corporate Counsel
Nothing in memory has caused as many general counsel to lose their jobs as quickly as stock options backdating. [read post]
10 Sep 2006, 11:15 am
See Herring v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
Finally, capital stock taxes penalize investment and expansion. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Harrow v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:54 am
By Lene Powell, J.D.The recent ruling in SEC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
Tinkler v Ferguson The case of Tinkler -v- Ferguson [2018] EWHC 3563 (QB) concerned a claim by a director of Stobart Group Limited (“Stobart”), against five other members of Stobart’s board of directors of that company. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:16 am
It is in such speeches that one will find a well stocked array of critical comments concerning: The “radical transformation” in law brought about by the courts and law schools of the 1960s; the notion of “‘THE LIVING CONSTITUTION’”; departures from text and original meaning of the Constitution; the opinion in New York Times v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 8:55 am
In C.W. v. [read post]
