Search for: "People v. Tooks"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 11,092
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 6:38 am
It took more to go against the custom and utilize the Constitution to try to uphold what it means in light of what people are subjected to on the streets in our country. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
Following Thompson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:13 pm
Once again the focus of the lecture was on litigants in landmark twentieth-century cases – this time, the petitioners in the 1969 case Tinker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:31 am
The resulting delay from the unsuccessful attempt to locate a K-9 unit took an additional 38 minutes. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
In Skinner v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
Example: Portable electronic camera was one early name; took a while to converge on “digital camera. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:48 pm
In People v Cass (#28 decided 2/16/12) the defendant's claim of extreme emotional disturbance was undercut by the fact that he'd allegedly committed a nearly identical murder 14 months earlier. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 5:13 pm
Rosencrants, 89 Misc.2d 721, 392 N.Y.S.2d 808; People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:12 pm
Kansas v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 4:12 pm
Tagiyev’s wife has continued the proceedings over her husband’s conviction and imprisonment, proceedings that took more than 11 years before the European Court. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 8:43 am
On November 28, 2018, oral argument was heard in Tyson Tibbs v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:40 pm
However, in Cargill v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
” (Mooppan referred to Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 5:44 pm
Well, People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:45 am
I was out of town, or else I'd have much enjoyed being there as well; but I'm very glad it took place, thanks to the newly formed UCLA chapter of Heterodox Academy. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:28 am
The Court noted the fact that the text of s.24 § 7 of the 1881 Act distinguishes between statements which directly encourage people to commit certain offences and those which encourage discrimination [43]. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
R(A) v Lambeth; R(Lindsay) v Lambeth [2002] EWCA Civ 1084 applied. [read post]
