Search for: "People v. Utter"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2007, 4:13 pm
In People v Nieves-Andino, 2007 NY Slip Op 05584, the victim of a shooting who later died, Jose Millares, was discovered lying in the road by a police officer responding to a 911 call regarding a... [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 9:26 am
As a reminder, Thomas's concurrence calls for the overruling of Tinker v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 6:06 pm
July 17, 2007) [No Man: US v. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 2:31 pm
"Bush v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:27 am
WESTCHESTER COUNTY Criminal Practice Words Uttered by Defendant Not for Legitimate Purpose; Dismissal of Harassment Charges Denied People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 11:27 am
If you are a member of the judiciary and wish to add your credibility to the project by letting us shamelessly use your name, please put the word "judge" in the title line of your email ...Pavel Pinkava's petition for leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal's ruling in LIFFE v Pinkava (judgment here; IPKat post here) has just been refused by the House of Lords. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 7:55 pm
Bill Posner (not Richard Posner) writes a rather interesting article about the now infamous banner at the center of Morse v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 8:42 am
The People responded that the statement was admissible as an excited utterance and that its admission would not violate the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
In Fox v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 9:26 pm
Answer: because lawyers are more important than other people. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:39 pm
See, for example, Zapata v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:20 pm
But people should no longer depend on the ACLU to defend what they preach (especially at a cost), if it disapproves of what they practice. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:45 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence911 Call Properly Admitted as 'Excited Utterance'; Denial of §2254 Habeas Relief Recommended Ramos v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The following is a glossary of a broad list of legal terms, civil and criminal, state and federal and not just those in a divorce or family law case. [read post]
2 May 2007, 12:32 pm
Power in a democracy resides with people. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 9:11 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 12:31 pm
Simply put, these individuals were the litigants from hell: the kind of people you hate litigating against.Ultimately -- and totally justly -- the trial court grants terminating sanctions against Letantia and Todd. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm
Apparently, prior to the performance, the principal had told the 11th graders that they could read the play, but not utter the V-word. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 10:38 am
But, for me, I'd rather hang my hat on dying declaration grounds than spontaneous utterances, which I think isn't really true here.As an aside, the defendant said two random, interesting things to the police once they caught up with him immediately after the fire. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 3:59 pm
In People v. [read post]
