Search for: "People v. Wisdom" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
As the chaos unspooled from President Trump’s executive order on family separations, a conventional wisdom quickly emerged: This order was an echo of the very first executive order of Trump’s presidency—the travel ban. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Pozen is certainly correct that there is increasing discussion among academics and a few pundits and politicians about reforming the electoral college, but I think it remains to be seen whether it will genuine “gain traction” or simply founder on the shoals either of Article V, insofar as some of the proposed changes would undoubtedly require constitutional amendment, or on the determination by the Republican Party that the GOP probably benefits from continued… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
Rumsfeld (2004) (allowing detention of a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant) and in Boumediene v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  As social creatures, they are subject to the same pushes and pulls of social psychology that explain most people. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Seamus Hughes, Devorah Margolin
Conventional wisdom would suggest that the homegrown jihadist threat will regress back to its pre-Islamic State scale. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Pam Samuelson: legislative changes/courts v. legislators? [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Court will leave the political debate about those differences to others; a vote of the people on that will be taken on November 6. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
It cannot be assumed the judges in the Supreme Court have some intrinsically greater wisdom or knowledge of the law than those in the Court of Appeal or even the High Court despite the fact that they will almost certainly have greater judicial experience. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
Our staff has published a “frequently asked questions” resource to demystify the rulemaking process and identify opportunities for the public to engage.22 We will also host a virtual public forum on September 8, where people will be able to provide oral remarks that will be part of the ANPR record.23 I am grateful to our agency staff for their work on this ANPR and my colleagues on the Commission for their engagement and input. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:20 am by Chris Seaton
People just tend to forget them when they’re scared. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
We talked about some of the many battles this interaction has birthed, from massive resistance against Brown v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 12:58 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v]   What makes the Solarwinds attack difficult is that (1) for the most part entities allowed the updates as [read post]