Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 1121 - 1140 of 13,617
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2022, 5:31 am by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Havertown, PA, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
  Note also that there are similarities with the pending enablement petition in Amgen v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 12:21 pm by Kevin
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a "tangible object" (United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
“They are ‘owned by, produced by or for, or . . . under the control of the United States Government. . . . [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 12:44 pm by Katilyn Hollowell
The case, filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Louisiana as In re Falcon V, L.L.C., concerned a $10.5 million surety agreement between the Debtor, Falcon V, L.L.C., and Argonaut Insurance Company (“Argonaut”). [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 9:05 am by Guest Author
A case that the Supreme Court will hear in the October, 2022 Term, United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm by Unknown
United States (Trust Relationship; Mineral Leasing) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Ahtna, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
The issuance of this decision now tees up the more typical appellate options, which could include an appeal to the Fifth Circuit en banc, an appeal to the Supreme Court’s shadow docket for an emergency restoration of the injunction, or an appeal to the Supreme Court through the normal certiorari petition process. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 8:57 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
In 2021, a Ninth Circuit three-justice panel held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) didn’t preempt AB 51, and thus California could enforce its prohibition on mandatory employment arbitration agreements (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
Missouri, 2022) [Japan] [Petition granted] [Habitual residence] [Grave risk of harm not established][Consent or acquiescence not established]   In Tsuruta v Tsuruta, 2022 WL 4299814( E.D. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:30 pm by Aimee Brown
The second case this week is United Power, Inc. v. [read post]