Search for: "Pictures Words, Inc."
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 10:11 pm
In other words, Overstock.com wants to know in advance exactly who the California District Attorney is going to talk to. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am
” Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Google, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-04080-BLF, April 1, 2015 (“Svenson”). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
Starting in 2002 and continuing for about a decade, 1-800 Contacts systematically locked up many of its online contact lenses retail competitors into settlement agreements that prohibited the parties from bidding on each other’s trademarks at the search engines. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Here, now, Carl’s story in his own words. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
For its part Europcar typically used a logo which comprised the word EUROPCAR above a “horizon” element. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
YouTube In 2006, Viacom International Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
While this case is clearly significant for SCCs and Facebook’s operations, there is a larger picture that involves the Court’s stance against mass (or undifferentiated) surveillance. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 5:01 am
My favorite illustration of this comes in New Times, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of that issue by explain that Rekte argued thatthe court erred in applying Evidence Code Sections 1552 and 1553, respecting the information depicted in the records of Redflex Traffic Systems, consisting of the traffic citation, the 12–second video, and several still pictures of the vehicle with computer data imprinted at the top of the photographs. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 6:14 am
Sony Pictures Classics Inc., No. 12-cv-00100 (N.D. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Christie’s, Inc, Michael Steinhardt, and Anatolian Marble Female Idol of Kiliya Type (“Stargazer”) will not be counted among the 17 that the NY district attorney’s antiquities trafficking team already has charged over the years. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 6:47 am
We were trying to get some clarity on the proper import of Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:43 am
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
And the objecting employer is cut out of the picture altogether. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Texas Supreme Court to hear oral argument on Tuesday, October 10, 2017 in client's fee fight with his former attorney following conclusion of drawn-out fight over inheritance money. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
The problem is that some courts have adhered to the strict technical sense of words and defined “to copy” so narrowly that it doesn’t correspond with the common sense definition. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
The leading case appears to be the Fourth Circuit's 1999 ruling in Food Lion Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:48 am
Quirky Inc.: 70,000 users, 40% in the US. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:55 am
As readers, we are left no doubt as to who’s done what – and it’s quite clear what’s wrong with this picture. [read post]
