Search for: "Power v. Holder" Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday evening, the court asked both sides in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Not necessarily.Rumors have been circulating that the new EO will apply the same criteria as EO 13769 but expressly exempt green card holders, student visa holders, and other people with substantial contacts with the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 1:09 am by Jani Ihalainen
Too excessive, and you can cause for the balance of power to excessively shift to the rights holder's hands, possibly even encouraging the misuse of those rights in the search of easy monies. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
Holder, under the old regime, an LPR “could travel abroad for brief periods without jeopardizing his resident alien status. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 5:52 am by SHG
Holder, which gutted the Voting Rights Act….Rather than calling balls and strikes, Chief Justice Roberts was a 10th player, shifting the power structure toward the privileged and away from the average American. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:41 pm by Jonathan Hafetz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its per curiam ruling in Washington v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
Rumsfeld); rejected the executive’s argument that the President’s power to enter into agreements with foreign nations included the power to instruct state courts to enforce those agreements (Medellin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am by Ed Stein
Any attempt to answer this is necessarily speculative, but the Supreme Court’s decision in Holder v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Lynch, 834 F.3d 1142 (10th Cir. 2016) (wrote opinion and concurred separately) “inadmissibility under one-year bar prevented aliens who entered country illegally more than once from obtaining adjustment of status, did not apply retroactively to bar alien’s application for adjustment of status” Gorsuch wrote a separate concurrence expressing his doubts about the doctrine of Chevron deference, which “permit[s] executive bureaucracies to swallow huge amounts of core judicial and… [read post]