Search for: "Pure Precision Limited"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
"The right of free speech is not without limitations. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
T 0438/19 of 27-06-2023 referred the following questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:1. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
It is not limited to high-profile social media platforms. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 8:56 am
This effectively transforms the production or supply chain from a purely economic set of dependency relationshipsfounded on contract or ownership principles to a collection of political, economic, and social-cultural relationships which tie the downstream (dependent) collectives to the upstream leadership cores. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm
According to the record of the telephone conversation on file, neither the main request nor any of auxiliary requests 1 to 5 fulfilled the requirements of Article 56 EPC "basically for the same reasons as set out in the summons to oral proceedings namely that the claimed subject-matter is essentially directed to purely non-technical subject-matter which cannot contribute to inventive step". [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm
Today, T 116/18 was published on the Recent Decisions pages of the Boards of Appeal, referring the following questions to the EBA:The following questions are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision.If for acknowledgement of inventive step the patent proprietor relies on a technical effect and has submitted evidence, such as experimental data, to prove such an effect, this evidence not having been public before the filing date of the patent in suit and having been filed after… [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:48 pm
Last Wednesday, June 10, Cooper responded to Eisenberg that Bolton had fully discharged his duties under the NDA, that the manuscript doesn’t contain any classified information, and that the White House is thus seeking to block publication for “purely political reasons” and using alleged national security concerns as a “pretext to censor” Bolton’s book. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 7:57 am
If we are lucky, perhaps, years from its enactment, a new multi-state commission will be able to sort out the consequences of this treaty based approach, with its differential enforcement of variable standards subject to substantial additional variation in the way that administrative discretion is exercised by those states willing to apply the treaty and subject to the reservations states are likely to practice (irrespective of treaty language to the contrary; usually, as the Polish Supreme… [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am
In purely practical terms the Court in Svensson made a valiant attempt to balance the competing considerations of protecting rightsholders’ content without restricting reasonable user behaviour. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:57 pm
It does, however, suggest, the limitations of legal remedies within the domestic legal orders of interested states (cf. here). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Precisely because we have all these mechanisms to share opinion, how much of that is the right amount is a contestable thing. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am
In purely practical terms the Court in Svensson made a valiant attempt to balance the competing considerations of protecting rightsholders’ content without restricting reasonable user behaviour. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:31 am
In purely practical terms the Court in Svensson made a valiant attempt to balance the competing considerations of protecting rightsholders’ content without restricting reasonable user behaviour. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 12:01 am
In this document I will provide a road map of precisely how I believe that could be done, potentially setting the stage for an authoritarian political and intellectual dark age global in scope and self-perpetuating, a disempowerment of the individual which extinguishes the very innovation and diversity of thought which have brought down so many tyrannies in the past. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:11 am
3) Everyone in the software industry who does stuff related to programming computers falls somewhere fairly precise on this political spectrum, whether they realize it or not. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
Kevin F. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:22 am
Think how many times on this Opinio Juris blog, someone cites to a Nuremberg precedent; speaking purely descriptively, however, I don’t believe I ever heard a non-American human rights or humanitari [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
The latter individuals may be ones that rational contractors would wish to limit forced association with. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:53 am
This is certainly a departure from a pure Haig-Simons income tax – and as a “deferral of tax liability,” it would be considered a tax expenditure under the Haig-Simons definition – but it is too difficult to calculate. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
We like the stronger interpretation of Fed. [read post]
