Search for: "Reed v. State"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
Here's another guest post by Reed Smith's own Kevin Hara, this time about a recent Texas case holding that health care providers involved in clinical trials are still protected by a state medical malpractice statute, and thus were fraudulently joined. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
State v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 9:31 am
Reed v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:18 am
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:16 am
”(per Mr Justice Fulford, Southard v DPP [2006] EWHC 3449). [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:32 am
Montana, like many states, elects judges. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am
” Before the Court of Appeal, the Test Claimants argued that, where a claimant is seeking to recover money paid under a mistake of law, the effect of section 32(1)(c) is to postpone the commencement of the limitation period until such time as the true state of the law is established by a judicial decision from which there lies no right of appeal. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
A hedge fund also filed an access proposal at Reliant Energy, but the Texas-based company sought a court ruling that it was not bound by the AFSCME v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:26 am
In 1975, the United States Supreme Court held in Weinberger v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:36 pm
Reed, 51 M.J. 559 (New MexicoCourt of Criminal Appeals 1999). . . . [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
On appeal, the First Department held that Justice Reed “correctly dismissed the complaint based on plaintiff’s lack of standing. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:42 am
In the United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
The mortgage application form stated that the house was being purchased on a “buy to let” basis, with vacant possession and that all tenancies granted would be for 6 months or less. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
First, we have a straightforward application of TwIqbal in Reed v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
In Reed, the Supreme Court used a simple approach. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lords Neuberger, Reed, and Hodge. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
