Search for: "STATE v COOL"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2010, 7:40 am
ECL § 11-0535; see also State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:10 pm
In light of Tuesday’s Supreme Court ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:29 am
While not quite rising to the level of the Tiger Woods affair, the 2008 Qualcomm v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:05 pm
Last year, in Entergy v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Marshall discussed the sale of genuine goods with the barcoded data removed constituted a trade mark infringement in the US, reviewing Davidoff's successful COOL WATER action against CVS (here) and the bizarre manner of its expression.Dr Peter Ruess (International School of Management, Frankfurt) then examined the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling in Court C-57/08 COPAD v Dior. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
R. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
The baby was cool to the touch, was not crying, and appeared to be in distress. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:09 pm
In Texas, that number is a cool 0%. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 12:13 pm
That level of interest in the Court is unparalleled today, except for in isolated cases like Bush v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 9:24 pm
The state appellate court in New Jersey recently had occasion to revisit the Dendrite analysis in a case called A.Z. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 12:01 pm
cool. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:10 pm
Boeing Co., 662 F.2d 975 (3d Cir. 1981); see also State Contracting & Eng'g Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:05 pm
B Nagesh, a student of C V Raman High School, told his parents of his marriage with his Hindi teacher D Ramyasri four days later. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Local groups oppose the project because its proposed location places it in the watershed of two of the state’s highest quality native trout streams and on a major bat and bird migratory route. [read post]
