Search for: "STATE v. HERNANDEZ"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2014, 9:35 am
See State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:14 pm
” United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:11 pm
(To be sure, it has prevailed in some other courts, including Hernandez v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm
Issues Around Privacy and the Right to Be Forgotten And The Freedom of Expression on Online Social Networks ,Lennin Hernandez Gonzalez, KU Leuven – Centre for IT & IP Law (CiTiP) Right to Be Forgotten: Much Ado About N [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:49 am
Forty-one days after Gene's lecture, CAAF would issue its opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 4:00 pm
For example, in Hernandez v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 4:00 pm
For example, in Hernandez v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 4:00 pm
For example, in Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
Butler, Medford OR) United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
“ Rodrigo Hernandez v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 9:37 am
United States (finding a contract based on a mistake of fact is voidable); Hernandez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
Human Rights Committee’s decision in Teitiota v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:17 am
Attorney Alex V. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 11:26 am
" Restitution Order Requires Transparent Estimate of LossIn United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 9:28 am
Additional Resources: David v. [read post]
