Search for: "STATE v. HERNANDEZ"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2008, 1:14 pm
Case Name: Schluck v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:21 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 3:39 am
In the case of Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 4:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Relying on Anderson, California courts have shifted the burden of proof to employers when inadequate records prevent employees from proving their claims for unpaid overtime hours (Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Clinton Hernandez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 3:42 pm
” In EZ Pawn Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
Relying on Anderson, California courts have shifted the burden of proof to employers when inadequate records prevent employees from proving their claims for unpaid overtime hours (Hernandez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 2:54 pm
Two new petitions granted The Court added these two cases to its argument schedule for the fall: Hernandez v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
The conservative upstate court, whose judges were elected by voters in Western New York and four of whom were appointed to the Appellate Division by Governor George Pataki, concluded that the 2006 decision by New York's highest court, Hernandez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
Although that case was settled by the parties and no further ruling was required, the 2nd Department panel granted a motion by the teacher's lawyers to vacate the trial court's decision, citing the Martinez case and implicitly agreeing with its holding, including the Martinez court's conclusion that the 2006 decision by the Court of Appeals in Hernandez v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 8:11 pm
Supreme Court's historic decision in the case of Lawrence v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:47 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Rosendo Hernandez, Jr. v. [read post]
11 May 2008, 11:32 am
The majority relied on State v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 9:24 am
In UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
EVIDENCEUnited States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
