Search for: "STATE v. SUMMERS"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 6,215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2021, 10:37 am
ShareIn 1969, the Supreme Court ruled in Tinker v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 8:45 pm
Box v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 7:09 pm
Two years ago in Rehaif v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 9:02 am
On August 19, 2020, the Supreme Court denied review and ordered not to be officially published the opinion in Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 8:02 am
At this point, I envision my next post on App Store matters on May 3, when the Epic Games v. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 6:01 am
Trump’s affinity for Russia or its president, Vladimir V. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:13 am
And last Friday night, in Tandon v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
Twitter case from last summer. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
On April 4, the Israeli High Court of Justice issued its judgment in National Responsibility v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 10:58 am
And in Morse v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 4:08 am
As I reported on Saturday, Waco-based Judge Alan Albright of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas denied an Intel motion to transfer or postpone the second VLSI v. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 12:32 pm
LA is proud to point out that the firm obtained a $40 million settlement in the Erikson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 11:36 am
This is probably not surprising to anyone, given its legalization in numerous states. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 7:06 pm
The process of ideological genesis over the course of the year is best captured from a state of anticipation without the benefit of foresight. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 3:33 pm
On Thursday, April 1, 2021 the Supreme Court unanimously voted to overturn the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia (“Third Circuit”) in the case of Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 6:00 pm
" COUNTY OF BUTLER, et al, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 5:20 pm
Qualcomm (San Jose, January 2019) and Apple v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:42 am
” As law professor Joanna Schwartz explains, Hope v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 2:56 am
And it may just hope that judges or the decision-makers in competition authorities could be gaslighted when a topic is technical and uneasiness may just be enough to let Apple sustain a harmful monopoly in app distribution.Come May, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hear what Apple has been telling antitrust authorities around the globe for a while. [read post]
