Search for: "Sanchez v. Sanchez" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2008, 3:40 pm
Sanchez, 3675, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 8027; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:01 pm
Since we have just posted a Limerick commemorating the most celebrated of palimony cases, Marvin v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:19 pm
Sanchez, 4130, 949/07, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 7078; 54 A.D.3d 638; 864 N.Y.S.2d 17; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:38 pm
Second, the New York State Court of Appeals has held to enforce the preemption of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 by the Graves Amendment (see Graham v Duckley, supra; Johnson v Kling, 854 NYS2d 648 [2 Dept 20081, reversed on other grounds, 10 NY3d 887 [2008]; Hernandez v Sanchez, 836 NYS2d 577 [1 Dept 2007]; Kuryla w Halabi, 835 NYS2d 230 [2 Dept 2007]; Jones v Bill, 825 NYS2d 508 [2 Dept 20063, reversed on other grounds, 10 NY3d 550 [2008]). [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:42 am
  Here's your chance to decide, based on the facts taken directly from the appellate court's opinion in Stephen Salinas v. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
The exception applies not only at the physical boundaries of the United States, but also at the "the functional equivalent" of a border, Almeida-Sanchez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Sanchez-Badillo, No. 051800, 052045, 052047 Convictions and sentences for conspiring to distribute heroin, cocaine, cocaine base, and marijuana are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) jury's conspiracy verdict was not supported by evidence; 2) trial court made sentencing errors; 3) evidence was insufficient to support jury's verdict against one of the defendants on weapons charges and prosecutorial misconduct entitles him to a new trial; and 4) trial judge made impermissible… [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:28 pm
Writes Scotusblog: "The burden [Justice Tom] Price cited included the Supreme Court's ruling in 2006 in Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 5:24 pm
  The burden Price cited included  the Supreme Court’s ruling in 2006 in Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]