Search for: "Say v. Baker"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2010, 4:16 am
Cases considered included: R v IAT, ex p Bakhtaur Singh [1986] 1 WLR 910; Soering v UK [1989] 11 EHRR 439; Huang v SSHD [2007] UKHL 11; AS (Pakistan) v SSHD [2008] EWCA Civ 1118; EB (Kosovo) v SSHD [2008] UKHL 41; JO (Uganda) v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 10]. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:17 pm
The view that the new HMGs are the result of right-wing capture of the process is — lets say, lacking both logic and supporting evidence. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 8:20 pm
(Debra Baker v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:37 pm
” Amestoy was the author of Baker v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:31 pm
Jennifer Gordon, the Baker Botts attorney who hosted the BIO panel cited in the motion and wrote BIO's amicus brief in the Myriad case, says she finds the ACLU-PubPat motion "sort of surprising," and disagrees that Rader's comments were an indication that he had already made up his mind about the gene patent suit. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
Culgan v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:17 am
Sullivan of Baker Botts LLP and John M. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:46 pm
In Shandler v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:14 pm
While the recent Georgia Supreme Court opinion in Baker v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
In Hubbard v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 10:50 am
Baker v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:58 am
Louisiana, and Graham v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm
In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:01 am
(Stewart Baker) Not long ago I criticized the SG’s submission to the Court on whether to grant cert in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:14 am
Baker. [read post]
