Search for: "Seattle v. State"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
ALLENS NATURALLY refused registration over ALEN AMERICAS for cleaning preparations (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps EB’s Fine Handbags – Seattle seller caught with 33,700 fake handbags (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:47 am
The environmental plaintiffs rely on United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington… [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
Seattle School District No. 1, etc. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
The opposite approach is what Nussbaum calls "lofty formalism," represented by cases like Ledbetter v Goodyear and Parents Involved v Seattle School District. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
Cozad Trailer Sales, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Egg Works left with egg on its face after court denies preliminary injunction against Egg World: Egg Works, Inc. et al v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Seattle School District (2007); Grutter v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 9:40 am
The Ninth Circuit, however, only stated that adidas could prosecute these claims. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
Siers: Reasoning that, under State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:03 am
Telecom Association v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 6:21 am
Brady v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 10:04 am
Washington State Gambling Commission, __ P.3d __, 2010 WL 3432595 (Washington Supreme Court 2010) [hereinafter Betcha v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 9:29 am
Alfasigma USA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:01 am
In this post here I'd like to share with you the opening brief that Google's Motorola Mobility filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit earlier this week in the Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
Gilliam(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) District Court E D Wisconsin: Another cautionary tale of joint website ownership: Third Education Group, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:00 am
Ass’n of Tacoma, 50 Wash. 236, 96 P. 1078 (1908), City of Seattle v. [read post]
4 Dec 2001, 4:00 pm
Ass'n of Tacoma, 50 Wash. 236, 96 P. 1078 (1908), City of Seattle v. [read post]
