Search for: "Sellers v. United States"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on… [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:50 am
In United States v Jindal, (ED Tex. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:50 am
In United States v Jindal, (ED Tex. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:36 am
Coryn Group II, LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 12:54 pm
Meanwhile, under California’s common law, imitating another person’s voice can violate that person’s right of publicity, as seen in the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Midler v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
On appeal, Edwards argues that his conviction must be reversed and rendered because section 97-45-17 is unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and unconstitutionally vague in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:40 pm
United States, 529 U.S. 667 (2000), as: a misappropriation of funds that enriches a person of power or influence who uses the power or influence to make a different individual, organization, or company richer. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:21 am
United States, 308 F.3d 1283, 1288 (Fed. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:21 am
United States, 308 F.3d 1283, 1288 (Fed. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
National Football League (1709 Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Omega SA - American lawyers love expensive watches, ABA amicus brief confirms: Costco Wholesale Corp v Omega SA (IPKat) US Trade Marks – Decisions 9th Circuit modifies tests for laches and acquiescence: Seller Agency Council, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
Conference v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:52 pm
RTC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
In Borealis Power Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:02 am
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:16 am
"That reminded me of a passage from Qualcomm's reply brief in support of its Ninth Circuit appeal of the district court's FTC decision:"See United States v. [read post]
