Search for: "Seven Cases v. United States"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 4,159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2010, 6:51 pm
However, the court’s decision does not affect seven states, including Massachusetts, Connecticut and Vermont, which allow life without parole for juveniles in cases of homicide. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:40 am
United States, and a companion case, Sandlin v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:33 pm
(citing Seven Cases of Eckman’s Alterative v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:30 pm
The case decided today, Jesner v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:59 am
Guest Blogger Marshall Mintz provides his take below of United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:11 am
My contribution -- “‘Celebrating’ the Tenth Anniversary of the 2000 Election Controversy: What the World Can Learn from the Recent History of Election Dysfunction in the United States” – is available here. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm
The Lower Courts’ Decisions The Complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:23 am
These cases have all arisen very quickly since the United States v. [read post]
2 May 2025, 6:13 pm
Ganias, and the Fifth Circuit's ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
But Linroy Bottoson nonetheless stands for something exceedingly important about the death penalty in the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:55 pm
” City of Cleveland v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:20 am
The case, RILR v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Not that this is necessarily to be deplored; it is an ancient habit of polities in any case. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:16 pm
United States, Justice Scalia argued that this entire approach was illegitimate. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:16 pm
United States, Justice Scalia argued that this entire approach was illegitimate. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 8:57 am
Fiskars Finland OY AB v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:35 pm
The majority opinion in the state court, issued unsigned but in the name of the court (“per curiam”), sought to refute every argument made for same-sex marriage as a constitutional matter and lambasted the Supreme Court for making a “moral judgment, not a legal judgment” when it struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:40 pm
That case also involved the government’s attempt to rely to an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:21 am
In seven other cases — including Saleh v. [read post]
