Search for: "Simon v. State" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,741
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
Bill BuxtonMicrosoft ResearchOriginal: Jan. 12, 2007Version:  March 2, 2012 Keywords / Search Terms Multi-touch, multitouch, input, interaction, touch screen, touch tablet, multi-finger input, multi-hand input, bi-manual input, two-handed input, multi-person input, interactive surfaces, soft machine, hand gesture, gesture recognition . [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I read a very interesting opinion today — Cathey v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 6:11 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Patrick Kinsch, Private International Law Topics Before the European Court of Human Rights – Selected Judgments and Decisions (2010-2011)      Jonathan Hill, The Powers of the English Court to Support an Arbitration in “Foreign Seat” and “No Seat” Cases Christa Roodt, Border Skirmishes between Courts and Arbitral Tribunals in the EU: Finality in Conflicts of Competence Koji Takahashi, Conflict of Laws in Emissions Trading Thomas Kadner… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am by Roger Pilon
Kenneth Simon Chair in Constitutional Studies and is the founder and publisher of the Cato Supreme Court Review. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:15 am by Steve Hall
“Historically the United States has moved from more painful forms of execution to less painful forms,” Simon said. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:44 am by Broc Romanek
The case is Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 11:00 pm by Sam Murrant
In the courts Reilly & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Rev 1) [2012] EWHC 2292 (Admin) High Court rejects challenge to Government’s compulsory work experience scheme on human rights and legality grounds. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:18 am
The government took issue with suggestions that the consent decree was either too “regulatory” in nature and therefore overbroad or too vague so that it was unenforceable.The Justice Department concluded that both opposing and supporting comments had at least one element in common: they agreed that entry of the decree likely will reduce retail prices for e-books, at least in the short term.The consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
He based this finding on the words of Lord Osborne in H M Advocate v William Frederick Ian Beggs (No2) (2002 S.L.T. 139). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:10 pm
You can read Joe Cohen's piece on Gimex v The Chillbag Company here. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am by Cormac Early
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has video of a recent conference of privacy law scholars on the “mosaic theory” of Fourth Amendment searches, which was embraced by the two concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]