Search for: "Smith v. United States"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 4,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
Edwards, 415 U.S. 800, 802-803 (1974) and United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In Smith v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
On December 22, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
United Farm Workers Nat. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980); and a third based on United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 2:47 am
A Ninth Circuit appeals court ruling may bring a question back to the Supreme Court about the ability to sue border agents at the United States-Mexico border for fatal shootings. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
United States, 21-5967Issue: Whether Zenon Grzegorczyk is entitled to relief on his claim that knowingly using a facility of interstate commerce with intent that a murder be committed, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
" … The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit provides [under the James v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:29 pm
Case Name: TERRY SMITH v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
Vogle v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:45 am
The jury didn’t buy it, and Elonis was convicted after a trial in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 5:14 am
Here is the abstract:In 1996, Congress, as part of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, amended the list of noncommercial tort exceptions to sovereign immunity in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act ("FSIA") in response to a federal court's determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Libya and alleged Libyan terrorists in Smith v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
Facts: This case (Joan Cravens Construction, Inc. et al v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 2:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 1:30 am
First, Kerr says that Smith is inconsistent with United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
”The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth’ (Masson v New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501… [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:14 am
State v. [read post]
