Search for: "Stanley v. Stanley" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 1:23 pm by Eric
By Eric Goldman Google, Inc v. myTriggers.com, Inc., 09 CV 14836 (Franklin County Ct. of Common Pleas, Ohio). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
However, this principle is not unlimited (see Cullen v Stanley [1926] IR 73 (SC); though quaere whether the case would be decided on its facts in the same way in the light of Quinlavan v O’Dea and Allister v Paisley above). [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The critical question in determining whether an action sounds in medical malpractice or simple negligence is the nature of the duty to the plaintiff which the defendant is alleged to have breached” (Stanley v Lebetkin, 123 AD2d 854, 854 [2d Dept 1986] [citations omitted]). [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 4:52 pm
• Boxer X, a/k/a Stanley Farley v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 4:52 pm
• Boxer X, a/k/a Stanley Farley v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm by INFORRM
  Dyson LJ and Stanley Burnton J upheld a conviction under the Malicious Communications Act 1988 for sending pharmacists pictures of an aborted foetus. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
Dec 04, 2007) (NO. 2280, 6956/04)Stanley Neustadter, New York (Kristina Schmelz of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:54 pm
This Thursday, Oct. 16: 12:00 PM - Stanley Klotz v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:43 am
Apr 19, 2007) (NO. 819, 4537/04)Stanley Neustadter, Cardozo Appeals Clinic, New York (Jane C. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" Kaiser v Van Houten, 12 AD3d 1012, 1014 (3rdDept 2004); Risman v Leader, 256 AD2d 1245, 1245 (4th Dept 1998); Dirito v Stanley, 203 AD2d 903 (4th Dept 1994). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Westcott v Westcott [2008] EWCA Civ 818, Ward, Sedley and Stanley Burnton LJJ held that when a person who makes a complaint to the police, thereby instigating a police investigation which does not lead to a prosecution, he nonetheless has a defence of absolute privilege. [read post]