Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 12,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2012, 12:03 pm
But we believe that United States Supreme Court has spoken on the issue, and we are required to follow its binding authority. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
In M/S Bremen v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its highly-anticipated ruling in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 2:32 pm
In Brittania-U Nigeria, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:38 am
The California Supreme Court, however, relied rather heavily on the rationale behind United States Supreme Court’s decision in Salinas. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 2:12 pm
The California Supreme Court, however, relied rather heavily on the rationale behind United States Supreme Court’s decision in Salinas. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 7:45 am
The complaint (full text) in United Poultry Concerns v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
United States, 122 F. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
United States, 122 F. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:08 pm
Since Watson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am
California Building Industry Assn. v City of San Jose, S212072 (June 15, 2015) involved Plaintiff trade association’s challenge to Defendant City’s ordinance to require developments containing 20 or more units to make 15% of those units available for low or moderate income purchase. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:55 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
As detailed in IntLawGrrls posts available here, California's Proposition 8 limiting marriage to opposite sex couples was declared unconstitutional by a federal judge, but that ruling was stayed and the case is presently on appeal.Although in the United States marriage is within the province of state rather than federal law, the federal Defense of Marriage Act, passed in 1996, continues to define marriage as limited to opposite sex couples. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 4:21 pm
State v Casillas. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:35 am
In California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:03 pm
Trend Micro Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 14-435-LPS (D.Del., January 16, 2015), the Court granted defendants’ motion to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (“Northern District”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:21 pm
In the pending cases United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:39 pm
” One-E-Way Inc. v. [read post]
