Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 1121 - 1140 of 3,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
Three of these states—Connecticut, New York, and Wyoming—impose taxes mirroring the old Ohio corporate franchise tax, under which businesses pay the greater of net worth or net income liability.[12] Beginning in 2006, Ohio CFT liability declined in increments of 20 percent a year, with firms responsible for 80 percent of their standard liability that year, 60 percent in 2007, and so on until 2010, when the tax was eliminated. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 5:00 am by John Zarych
Many of these are also among the most abused drugs in the United States and New Jersey. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:34 am by John Mikhail
., born outside of the territories that became the United States. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:44 am by Joel R. Brandes
Diaz removed the children from Ecuador without his consent, and was wrongfully retaining them in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 2:48 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
  This is particularly true in jurisdictions such as New Jersey, that have relatively liberal discovery rules. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 12:47 pm by Alka Bahal
Alka is situated in Fox Rothschild’s Roseland, New Jersey office though she practices throughout the United States and at Consulates worldwide. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am by Eliana Baer
Indeed, the right against self-incrimination, although not protected by the New Jersey constitution, is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence and codified in N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-19, which states that every person in New Jersey “has a right to refuse to disclose in an action…any matter that will incriminate him or expose him to penalty…” Both the United States Supreme Court and our New Jersey courts… [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am by Eliana Baer
Indeed, the right against self-incrimination, although not protected by the New Jersey constitution, is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence and codified in N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-19, which states that every person in New Jersey “has a right to refuse to disclose in an action…any matter that will incriminate him or expose him to penalty…” Both the United States Supreme Court and our New Jersey courts… [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:05 am by John A. Gallagher
The defendant maintained that the settlement proceeds were tantamount to w-2 income.Treated Differently Than Other Employment-Related StatutesThe district court observed that the Third Circuit, the patron court of the district courts located in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and the Virgin Islands, and yet to rule on the issue. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 8:33 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which the justices ruled that co-conspirators who do not benefit personally from illegal proceeds cannot be ordered to forfeit property. [read post]