Search for: "State of New York v. United States" Results 1121 - 1140 of 16,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2024, 8:00 am by Sherica Celine
Read our new practice note, International Business Travel to the United States: Key Strategies for Entry and Admission , by Sari Long of Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:39 am by Howard Friedman
The Orders are, therefore, arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law and in violation of petitioners’ rights under the United States Constitution and New York State law.The complaint also contends that the Order ignores the risk of harm from compulsory vaccination. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
After months of deliberation, last week the Supreme Court declined the most recent chance to revisit New York Times v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:24 pm by John Fullerton III
  The court found that the only connection with the United States – that Siemens A.G. has listed American Depository Receipts on the New York Stock Exchange, and is therefore subject to securities laws within the United States – was insufficient to overcome the requirement that there be some sign of Congressional intent for the anti-retaliation provision to apply overseas. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:24 pm by John F. Fullerton III
  The court found that the only connection with the United States – that Siemens A.G. has listed American Depository Receipts on the New York Stock Exchange, and is therefore subject to securities laws within the United States – was insufficient to overcome the requirement that there be some sign of Congressional intent for the anti-retaliation provision to apply overseas. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:10 am
The problem with these arguments is that they’ve already been addressed by the Court in New York v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:27 am
The Court certified to the New York State Court of Appeals the question of whether New York common law recognizes the doctrine. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:35 pm
  On October 9, 2001, The New York Times published an article stating that Merck had reexamined its own data and “found no evidence that Vioxx increased the risk of heart attacks. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 7:38 am by NBlack
(Notably, the holding in Jiles was contradicted by the conclusion reached in a subsequent United States Supreme Court decision, Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 7:38 am by NBlack
(Notably, the holding in Jiles was contradicted by the conclusion reached in a subsequent United States Supreme Court decision, Carpenter v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 9:31 am
In its appeal, Rapid argued: Rapid's earlier arbitration award in Texas was valid and enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act; and The Full Faith and Credit Clause in Article IV of the United States Constitution required the New York District Court "to give preclusive effect to a Texas state court judgment confirming the arbitration award". [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:51 pm by John Stigi
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed, applying the reasoning in its own decision in Kiobel v. [read post]