Search for: "State v. Arnold"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 2:33 pm
See Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 10:01 pm
In Swearingen v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:30 pm
STATE OF WYOMING ex rel. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:34 am
PCAOB Chairman Doty remarked that the proposed standards - running to almost 300 pages - mark a "watershed moment" for auditing in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
Long v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm
Judge Arnold has been sitting on the case since it was remanded. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
The RecordTV v MediaCorp TV Singapore (2010) case was cited. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:33 am
They said much the same for use of a trade mark in L’Oreal v eBay. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The case is now pending before the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
Mr Justice Arnold and Mr Justice Dingemans, Mr Justice Popplewell, all of whom have presided over media cases, have been appointed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:01 pm
no7) Lyndon Johnson (14)--ditto5) Benedict Arnold (17)--too low5) Woodrow Wilson (17)--huh? [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 9:00 am
That's why I've repeatedly credited Arnold & Ruess's Dr. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 6:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that test. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:09 am
As IPKat readers will remember, there are two cases currently pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), ie GS Media [here] and Filmspeler, which will require everybody’s favourite court to address this very issue [here and here tables summarising the state of the art regarding linking in Europe at the moment].In the meantime, Katfriend and IP enthusiast Nedim Malovic (Stockholm University) has provided a recap of what has happened since… [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:15 pm
(Alan S. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 2:22 am
In light of the Gillette principle, it would not be justified to grant the patent holder protection against products that are not novel or inventive over the prior art (an issue that was also touched upon by Arnold LJ in FibroGen v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:33 am
In reality, virtually 100% of all app developers who are aware of Epic Games v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:40 am
Arnold, III, CFLS [read post]
