Search for: "State v. Arnold"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2013, 4:34 am
PCAOB Chairman Doty remarked that the proposed standards - running to almost 300 pages - mark a "watershed moment" for auditing in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:33 pm
See Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
Long v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
From Gruber v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm
Judge Arnold has been sitting on the case since it was remanded. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
The RecordTV v MediaCorp TV Singapore (2010) case was cited. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The case is now pending before the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
Mr Justice Arnold and Mr Justice Dingemans, Mr Justice Popplewell, all of whom have presided over media cases, have been appointed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:33 am
They said much the same for use of a trade mark in L’Oreal v eBay. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:01 pm
no7) Lyndon Johnson (14)--ditto5) Benedict Arnold (17)--too low5) Woodrow Wilson (17)--huh? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 8:57 am
V .... [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:05 am
Arnold Schwarzenegger and the state's attorney general to appeal a federal ruling that overturned the state's gay marriage ban. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
United States The Atlantic had a piece “The True Danger of the Trump Campaign’s Defamation Lawsuits”. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 6:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 2:22 am
In light of the Gillette principle, it would not be justified to grant the patent holder protection against products that are not novel or inventive over the prior art (an issue that was also touched upon by Arnold LJ in FibroGen v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:40 am
Arnold, III, CFLS [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:33 am
In reality, virtually 100% of all app developers who are aware of Epic Games v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 9:00 am
That's why I've repeatedly credited Arnold & Ruess's Dr. [read post]
