Search for: "State v. Brady"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
It may well have happened with last week’s decision in Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm
As forecast ad nauseum in recent weeks, the Court summarily reversed in one of the long-running trio of state-on-top habeas cases, Hardy v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
Connick v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
Murr v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 10:40 am
"False convictions occur for a vast array of reasons, but under Texas habeas law, proving prosecutors violated Brady v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 7:12 am
") AC29905 - State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:52 am
State of Indiana (NFP) S.J. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 2:10 pm
See, United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:45 am
And keep in mind that if the newly-discovered evidence is Brady material which should have been turned over by the State, a different test applies; as the 8th pointed out last year in State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 8:26 pm
” State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:14 pm
LambertDocket: 11-38Issue(s): Did the Third Circuit fail to properly apply the habeas deference standard to the state court’s rejection of respondent’s Brady claim? [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:44 am
Brady v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am
However, recordings released before 1972 are protected by state-level rather than federal copyright law, so digital services argued that that royalty obligation didn't apply to pre-1972 tracks. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
Thurschwell argued that based upon military commission rule 701 and Brady v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 10:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
