Search for: "State v. Burden" Results 1121 - 1140 of 22,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2017, 9:29 am by MBettman
The state failed to meet its burden that an alternate line of investigation was underway befo [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Here the issue involved "interaction burdens" rather than a single-state analysis. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:30 am by Mark A. Snider
Therefore, out-of-state income was subject to double taxation, a tax burden not imposed on in-state income. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:08 pm
  The public has a presumptive right of access to these proceedings, and where, as in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm by Rantanen
  The Court focused on Radio Corporation of America (RCA) v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:05 am by Nassiri Law
Although that decision was affirmed by the appellate court, the state supreme court in its review of Adams v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 5:11 pm
The Florida State Supreme Court, on July 12, 2012, in a 5-2 ruling, in State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 5:11 pm
The Florida State Supreme Court, on July 12, 2012, in a 5-2 ruling, in State v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division, however, remanded the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings, explaining that Supreme Court failed to address the Petitioners' request for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees.As the Court of Appeals noted in Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division, however, remanded the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings, explaining that Supreme Court failed to address the Petitioners' request for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees.As the Court of Appeals noted in Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:17 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The four causes of action alleged by the State of New York involved state law claims of fraud and misrepresentation, and the Court stated:  ”The party that removes the case bears the burden of establishing that there is a valid basis for federal question jurisdiction. [read post]