Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 1121 - 1140 of 4,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2019, 4:09 am by Peter Mahler
The defendants appealed to the Appellate Division, Second Department, which reversed the lower court’s ruling and dismissed the claims. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Other citizens who were enfranchised by the courts under s. 3 of the Charter include prison inmates (Sauvé v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:51 am by Nicholas Bronni
But the Supreme Court’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:33 am
However, in view of this evidence, Mr Justice Birss did find that the behaviour of Roche in withdrawing an appeal in order to avoid an adverse decision by a Board of Appeal (and the extra weight this would have over an Examining Division decision), was obvious shielding. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
The same sort of division was very much in evidence in Kisor v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:59 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, applying the well-known and long-derided three-part test from Lemon v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
I was an intellectual property (IP) lawyer before joining CanLII and although I wasn’t a litigator per se, I was routinely involved in IP cases before the Federal Court. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Rejecting CBD’s new theory on appeal that the two volumes were relevant to whether DOGGR should have supplemented the EIR or issued a subsequent EIR, the Court of Appeal cited authority that such a new theory regarding admissibility was barred (Lorenzana v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:09 am by Florian Mueller
This is the first part of today's little trilogy of FRAND-related posts.In early May, the Antitrust Division of the DOJ, under Qualcomm's former outside counsel and now-Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim, filed an amicus brief with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California more than three months after the FTC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
United States, United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The O'Grady decision by the Appellate Division, the full text of which is set out below, illustrates one such type of administrative disciplinary procedure and the individual's appeal from a determination made after hearing by the appointing authority conducted pursuant to Social Services Law §494 and 14 NYCRR 700.6[a]:Matter of O'Grady v Kiyonaga 2019 NY Slip Op 04170 Decided on May 29, 2019 Appellate Division, Second… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Second Appeal In January 2019, New York County Commercial Division Justice Jennifer G. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit agreed with Sulyma. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 11:34 pm
The Court of Appeal ultimately concluded that the High Court was correct i.e. the designs were valid but not infringed. [read post]