Search for: "State v. District Court" Results 1121 - 1140 of 72,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Eugia Pharma Specialties Ltd., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware recently granted both the Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ requests to stay the litigation, but denied the Plaintiffs’ additional request to toll the statutory 30-month stay under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
Eugia Pharma Specialties Ltd., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware recently granted both the Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ requests to stay the litigation, but denied the Plaintiffs’ additional request to toll the statutory 30-month stay under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am by INFORRM
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:01 pm by Orin Kerr
Holder, from Judge Kessler of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, who concludes the mandate is constitutional. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the District Minnesota under CAFA, and, as you would expect, plaintiffs filed a moved to remand. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 3:42 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On August 17, 2016, the California Supreme Court ordered the Fourth District’s opinion in People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 9:21 am
" The Court of Appeals reasoned that this entire subsection was invalidated by Dickerson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 3:03 am
Goodrich Corporation, currently pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Paducah Division. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:10 am
Kevin Shepherd won at an IAC remand hearing in State v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:27 pm
  This is the underlying question lurking in the case of Hampton Bays Union Free School District v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 2:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
That's today's order from Judges Andrew Hurwitz, Daniel Bress, and Patrick Bumatay: The district court's judgment is vacated, and this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]