Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 9,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2018, 6:04 pm
” (In so holding, the Court distinguished the case of Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:53 pm
In granting the motion to dismiss, the District Court went into a detailed analysis of the reasons why the court ruled that the plaintiff could not state a claim. [read post]
2 May 2017, 4:59 pm
” The trial court stated that these claims were barred by laches. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit decision involving a 1977 municipal election in Rhode Island; Roe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:06 am
Far east of the Eastern District, a certain panel of judges of the Munich I Regional Court held a Nokia [almost a troll] v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 8:30 am
The Supreme Court is scheduled to consider a cert petition in Defense Distributed v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 pm
Shortly after Payments IP moved to intervene in the California Case, Payments IP filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (the “Maryland Case”), asserting claims similar to those asserted by Payments IP in the California Case, including a claim for declaratory judgment regarding ownership of the Domain. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 10:00 am
Given the Court's holding that the PAGA waiver is invalid, the Court remanded to the district court to determine whether the PAGA claims should be arbitrated or litigated in court. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:54 am
Late yesterday, a district court in Texas issued its much-anticipated ruling in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, is significant because: (1) it involves a dispute over some fundamental but complex First Amendment doctrinal principles; (2) it conflicts with a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and (3) (for reasons 1 and 2), it may very well end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:32 am
The Court has now docketed District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:56 am
The Onglyza Product Cases, A165387 decided on April 19, 2023 by the First District Court of Appeal is a case to be aware of. [read post]
U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Warrantless GPS Surveillance and Tracking Case on November 8
6 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
According to a press release yesterday by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), on November 8, 2011, the Court will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
The record shows that the district court had Guillotte's detailed sentencing memorandum before it, which explained his mental health concerns and other mitigation, and the district court stated it had reviewed the materials. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
A federal district court preliminarily enjoined Executive Order 13943 seeking to kick WeChat out of the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 11:50 am
But that issue has a real-life impact as reflected in a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:15 am
In Khalip v Khalip, 2011 WL 1882514 (E.D.Mich.) [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 10:38 pm
The Court also noted that if it were to impose a particularity requirement, it would create a “strange judicial dynamic” risking contradictory decisions by different districts over the sufficiency of a first-filed qui tam complaint. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:47 am
The IPKat has just found out that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has now handed down its opinion in Voda v Cordis (1st February 2007).The issue before the court was whether or not a US District Court could exercise jurisdiction over a case involving the infringement of a foreign (non-US) patent (the court listed those patents: British, Canadian, European (sic), French and German patents) under the supplemental jurisdiction statute… [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:10 am
A federal district court just issued its first ruling in Bronner v. [read post]
