Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 2:26 am
CMEC appealed.In the Court of Appeal Lord Justice Etherton found (at paragraph 50) that the Judge had been wrong to conclude that the Commission was a creditor entitled to participate in, and that it was bound by, the IVA. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
Its existence, however, was accepted by Lords Steyn and Hope in Berezovsky v Michaels. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
It also means that cases such as Lower Street Properties v Jones, Church Commissioners v Meya, and MacDonald v Fernandez will become much less relevant in a lot of cases. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale also stated that even if the court had been able to find the possession order disproportionate to her rights under art 8, the appellant could not assume that this would have led to the order being refused. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:40 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
United States? [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:16 am
In adopting this new defense, Canada followed the lead of the then-House of Lords in England, which had transformed English defamation law in 2006 and 1999 decisions by embracing the "responsible journalism" defense.Ever since New York Times v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 11:22 am
State. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:41 pm
Lord Abbett Mun. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:59 am
In delivering the judgment Lord Sumption stated that the Court of Appeal authority Borneman v Wilson (1884) 28 Ch D 53 suggests that a trustee in bankruptcy must either adopt proceedings in their entirety or not at all, even where there are discrete prior proceedings conducted by the bankrupt before his appointment. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:07 am
Without this the level and extent of protection is unclear, and the mark should not be registered, since "…if the authorities and the public are left in a state of confusion as to the nature of the sign then these requirements will not be satisfied".Lord Justice Kitchin further noted that, when considering the precise make-up on a mark, one has to consider both the pictorial representation and the description that accompanies it. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
As reported by the Inquirer, a state appeals court “upheld the proposition that German privacy laws don’t apply to Facebook, and ruled that the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ULD) for the German state of Schleswig-Holstein has to accept that“. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
Notwithstanding the clear terms of section 33(1), after the commencement of the 2009 Act, courts either continued to apply the pre-Act line of authority commencing with the judgment of Lord Coleridge in Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269, or at least to interpret section 33(1) through the lens of those cases. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 3:25 am
Lord Neuberger was particularly keen that experimental policies not be deterred: para [97]. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:09 am
Lord Carnwath stated that there is nothing to rule out consideration of mitigation measures at the EIA screening stage, but the Directive and the Regulations expressly envisage that they will where appropriate be included in the environmental statement. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Secretary of State and J v. [read post]
