Search for: "State v. Rhodes"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,570
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 10:42 am
Lis v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:04 am
Dixon, supra (quoting Rhode Island v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:46 pm
In Rhode Island, Governor Chafee has done the virtually unthinkable, refused to hand over a state detainee to federal prosecutors to face capital trial, choosing instead to try him in state court. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:27 pm
& Elliott, Inc. (1997), United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:15 am
But in Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:48 pm
There were eight plaintiff states in the original lawsuit, and six remain in the case: Connecticut, New York, California, Iowa, Rhode Island and Vermont, according to WSJ. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:36 am
"There's never been a study this comprehensive or this rigorous that actually measured access to specialty care, let alone children's access," said Karin V. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:08 am
On June 19, 1995 the United States Supreme Court handed down judgment in Hurley v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:47 pm
Blair v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:13 am
The fatality is identified as Angel V. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:15 pm
Thrifty, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:01 am
(Slightly off topic) In Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
In a second case decided Thursday, DePierre v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:39 am
In the courts: RG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and North Wiltshire District Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 198 (AAC) (05 May 2011): Failure to provide family with enough housing benefit to give disabled daughters separate bedrooms not breach of human rights Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors v The Legal Services Commission [2011] EWHC 1323 (Admin) (25 May 2011): Immigration solicitor fails in challenge to Legal Aid contract – “sad” but… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
As we mentioned earlier in the week, Rhode Island has now fallen. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am
However, even if a plaintiff establishes the first prong, the plaintiff must still demonstrate that he or she would have succeeded on the merits of the action but for the attorney's negligence (see Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d 948, 949; McCluskey v Gabor & Gabor, 61 AD3d 646, 648; Peak v Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C., 28 AD3d 1028, 1030-31; see also Brodeur v Hayes, 18 AD3d 979; Raphael v Clune, White & Nelson, 201 AD2d… [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:41 pm
Thus, they ran afoul of that state’s punitive damages caps. [read post]
30 May 2011, 7:34 am
We have recently highlighted a few decisions coming out of Hogan v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 12:01 am
Downing/Salt Pond Partners v Rhode Island, No. 10-1484 (1st Cir May 23 2011) // [read post]
