Search for: "State v. Silver" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:48 pm
This doctrine has, in fact, been recognized by the Indian Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:25 pm by Victoria Kwan
Two days later, he spoke at a panel discussion for the Brooklyn Bar Association, where he defended the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Balasubramaniam, Department of Food Science and Technology at Ohio State University,  who has been conducting HPP research since 1995, is quick to agree with Cargill officials that the company's "Fressure" hamburgers represent a technological breakthrough. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In June 1969, the Supreme Court announced the modern test that governs when the government may punish speech as incitement in Brandenburg v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:30 pm by John Floyd
Ohio—a lesser silver standard justifying law enforcement action. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
  Thomas McCarthy's seminal treatise on trademark law states his "who are you, what are you" test. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:11 pm
Director Kappos also stated that the recent spate of mobile phone and technology patent disputes was not a by-product of a flawed patent system. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm by Bona Law PC
Something like this is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm by Steven M. Taber
The Noise Control Act contains the finding that “The Congress declares that it is the policy of the United States to promote an environment for all Americans free from noise that jeopardizes their health or welfare. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]