Search for: "State v. Sullivan"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 10:10 am
Former Solicitor General Gregory Garre, now representing petitioner Cory Maples, began by arguing that either of two scenarios, standing alone, should be enough to excuse his client’s procedural default: (1) the state’s role in failing to follow up when the orders notifying Maples’s Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers were returned unopened; or (2) the actions of the Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers in leaving the firm without notifying the court or… [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:07 am
Sullivan,Stephen A. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
Board of Education, Cooper v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
Board of Education, Cooper v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:56 pm
A full explanation of their analysis can be found in the case of Sullivan v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:51 pm
The article states that, since 1997, federal courts have determined that Department of Justice attorneys violated laws or ethical rules in some 201 cases, including the duty expressed by Supreme Court Justice George Sutherland over 70 years ago in Berger v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:25 am
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 1:04 pm
Norris v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
., on Friday, April 5, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, California, Diversity, Institutional Investors, Institutional voting, Proxy advisors, SB 826, State law, Surveys Review and Analysis of 2018 U.S. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:05 am
Many of his positions on church-state matters would normally be taken for quite liberal; for example, he argued the recent Supreme Court case of Town of Greece v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 6:10 am
Sullivan, 2007 U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:42 am
United States, 403 U.S. 713(1971) (Stewart, J., concurring); United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
The decision below is here; the only discussion there is: The petitioner failed to demonstrate “proper cause” for the issuance of a “full carry” permit (Penal Law § 400.00[2][f]; Matter of Hecht v Bivona, 11 AD3d 614; Matter of Sarro v Smith, 8 AD3d 395; Matter of Bando v Sullivan, 290 AD2d 691). [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:16 am
Sullivan? [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 10:09 am
Weideman Last November, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in Sullivan v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
This post is based on a Sullivan & Cromwell publication by Robert E. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Sullivan. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 5:47 pm
* Corbis Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 8:04 am
United States v. [read post]
