Search for: "State v. Wells" Results 1121 - 1140 of 67,223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am by Sarah Grant
The motion to compel implicated FBI interview summaries (Form 302s) that the prosecution says were redacted for reasons of relevancy and privilege, as well as witness testimony withheld for reasons of relevance and materiality. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:28 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
The ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in Al-Adsani v UK cannot be said to have settled the controversy, and the issue has returned to the Court in Jones v UK, as well as being put before the International Court of Justice in by Germany against Italy for failing to respect its jurisdictional immunities as a sovereign State.The conference will provide an overview of how different national courts in Europe have approached questions of the immunities of… [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant’s failure to lodge a timely, specific objection to the billing was insufficient to rebut any inference of an agreement to pay the stated amount (see Shaw v Silver, 95 AD3d 416 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 4:48 am
But not all "constitutional" reforms require Article V constitutional amendments or constitutional conventions. [read post]