Search for: "Stevens v. Thomas"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 2:26 pm
It is a history that was properly brought out in the Alito and Thomas opinions and not seriously disputed in the dissenting opinions authored by Justices Stevens and Breyer. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:12 pm
Alito (4) Yes (4) No (4) Yes (4) Thomas (1) No (1) Yes (1) Yes (1) Stevens (1) No (1) No (1) No (1) Breyer (3) No (3) No (3) No (3) Total No (5-4) No (8-1) Yes (5-4) The bottom line shows the tally for each issue and highlights the paradox. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:27 pm
In Apodaca v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:02 am
Supreme Court agreed 8-0.Scalia Pushes PointJustice Antonin Scalia had been itching for a judicial takings claim since the Court denied certiorari in Stevens v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:02 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Bilski v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
By Steven G. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:10 pm
But what does the decision in Bilski v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:34 pm
V. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
Ultimately, despite widespread speculation that Stevens would cap his distinguished career by writing the majority opinion in Bilski v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
Only Justice Thomas embraced this theory and he only addressed the right to bear arms. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:45 pm
Justices Stevens, Breyer, Ginsburg, and Sotamayor decried the Court’s majority ruling as unnecessary and indeed “fantastic” (but not in a good way). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
Justice Kennedy was joined by Justices Roberts, Thomas and Alito in full. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:42 pm
Five of the nine Supreme Court Justices agreed with Chicago on this point -- Justice Stevens in his lone dissent; Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, and Sotomayor in Justice Breyer’s dissent; and Justice Thomas in his concurrence in the result. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:19 am
This morning, in a highly anticipated decision, a fractured Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Circuit's judgment in Bilski v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:59 am
BTD has noted the dissent of Justice Stevens in today's decision in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:39 am
They are intended for a broader audience that the readers of Legal Theory Blog: The bottom line of today's decision in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:55 am
Thanks again to the folks at Prawfs for allowing me to loiter long enough to post about today's opinion in Bilski v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:37 am
The Second Amendment case is out: Erin: Alito announces McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:34 am
Here's the opinion in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:10 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
