Search for: "Stewart v. United States" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2007, 9:26 am
JUSTICE SCALIA: That is conferring upon the ICJ the responsibility to decide the meaning of a United States treaty which is United States law. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
United States (06-1164), asking whether the Tucker Act's six-year statute of limitations is jurisdictional (and may thus not be waived by the parties). [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
• The so-called "swing vote" on the Court has moved to the right every single time it has shifted over the past forty years, from Stewart to Powell to O'Connor to Kennedy. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 9:01 pm
Federal Bureau of Prisons (06-9130), asking whether the United States waived sovereign immunity with respect to suits for losses of prison inmates' personal property. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:54 am
An Ohio appellate court found that a similar statute in that state allowed only people -- not organizations or other entities -- to receive money from such accounts. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
Compare Appellant's Brief at 2-29 with United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 12:49 pm
Interestingly, the court might have taken its cue from the position of the United States Trustee, who filed an amicus brief on behalf of the financial institution. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
United States, 649 A.2d 301, 308 (D.C. 1994) ("a patient waives the privilege as to relevant evidence by filing a lawsuit which places in issue the patient's medical condition"); Carson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 10:14 am
My duty, rather, is to "decide cases ‘agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States.' " Id., at 530. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 2:39 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Court Dismisses Indictment Charging Sex Offender With SORNA Breach Arising From Move to New Jersey United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]