Search for: "Stills v. State" Results 1121 - 1140 of 50,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a  ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 9:16 am by Eric Goldman
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
At Monday's oral argument in Yeager v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:39 am
Naturally, the state supreme court will still have to consider the case, since there is a Nebraska Court of Appeals opinion on the books, and the court needs to decide what to do with it. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm by Adam Kielich
This month the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments on Sandifer v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 12:48 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Medina contended that no award of fees or expenses was appropriate because he believed (and still believes) in good faith that the parties had an agreement for the children to come to and remain in the United States to start school; the attorney's fees and costs claimed by Ms. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:51 pm by Edelboim Lieberman Revah PLLC
Additionally, in a Subchapter V case, the business is not required to pay quarterly fees to the United States Trustee. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:48 am
"Writes Robert Reich, ending with a question that undercuts the click-bait headline, in "The second American civil war is already happening/America will still be America. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Gareth Davies
Blogpost 55/2023 In OP v Commune d’Ans, the Court of Justice determined that a rule maintained by a Belgian municipality, which prohibited the showing of any signs of religious faith in the municipal workplace, could be justified by the cause of preserving an ‘entirely neutral administrative environment’. [read post]