Search for: "Stone v. State" Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
  There could be a third argument- i.e. that they both had the same idea, contributed significant relevant originality (Brighton v Jones [2004]) and, in fact, the selfies are works of joint authorship; there being collaboration present and no need for an intention to create a joint work (Beckingham v Hodgens [2002]). [read post]
14 May 2014, 10:13 am by Larry
In a 1927 decision called United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am by Eric Segall
" Stone told him that he was "a New Englander, ... a Jew, and you are not a Democrat. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
The TTAB cited the recent Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 7:38 am
Could "The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down," composed by a Canadian, really have integrated so much anguish, nostalgia and disappointment on one track without the input of Helm, the one Band member who actually hailed from the United States? [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by NL
On Ground 6, the GP’s letter stated that she was ‘fairly vulnerable’, not ‘very vulnerable. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by NL
This was sufficient in itself to distinguish this case from Hall v Wandsworth LBC, Carter v Wandsworth LBC [2004] EWCA Civ 1740; [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:07 pm
The trust properly asserted that the breach of loyalty was premised upon the failure of a fiduciary to act in good faith, consistent with Stone v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Cadwalladr stated that she did not intend to convey that meaning, and therefore dropped her truth defence and relied solely on a public interest defence at trial. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:04 pm by Mike
Regal Stone, Ltd., which is an action arising from the M/V CoscoBuscan’s allusion with the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:10 am by Eric Goldman
Normally, a proposal like this get rubber-stamped through a state bar’s review process, so its approval seemed inevitable. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:19 pm
  The controlling statutory law is N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 and the precedential case in the state of NJ is Baures v. [read post]