Search for: "Supervisors v. United States"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
Assistant United States Attorney Jared C. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
Assistant United States Attorney Jared C. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:30 pm
United States, 318 F.3d 250, 252 (D.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:27 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:47 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:02 pm
Constitution or the laws of the United States. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm
Most promising about the decision, was the Court's citation of Professor Richard Nagareda's commentary on class certification, which is the same scholarly authority the United States Supreme Court relied upon in Dukes to hold that commonality requires common issues whose resolution will resolve key issues of liability. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:24 am
" "Before the action could proceed to trial, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Garcetti v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:09 am
As a result of the 1973 case Gagnon v. [read post]
Judicial Review in Workers' Compensation Cases Discussed in Gilmore v. Director, Department of Labor
9 Apr 2012, 11:06 am
United States, 216 F.3d 1229, 1234 (11 Cir. 2000). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Scott Johnson (PowerLine) reports on this very interesting case (United States v. $35,131.00 in United States Currency (S.D. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd (2012); Acts of Resistance in Asylum Seekers’ Persecution Narratives, 40-54, in Immigrant Rights in the Shadows of United States Citizenship. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:30 am
., Federal Judge with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in Atlanta issued a lengthy ruling in a closely watched Americans With Disabilities Act case. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:13 pm
Harris claimed he "had repeatedly related his concerns about Lockheed fraudulently billing the United States to supervisors and managers. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 11:30 am
As a general rule, supervisors are excluded from the voting unit. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 11:30 am
As a general rule, supervisors are excluded from the voting unit. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:49 pm
In Medina v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:49 pm
In Medina v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Recently this doctrine became the focus of attention in an interesting case from the United States District Court in Hawaii. [read post]
