Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2007, 10:20 am
*For a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 12:00 am
The law school will be hosting a lunchtime program on U.S. and European Approaches to Regulating Social Media Platforms moderated by the law library's director Anne Klinefelter. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 1:00 am
One is the protecting data that's on the phone, people's contacts, stuff like that. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:30 am
Supreme Court ruled Friday that the N.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:49 am
Federal law also varies sometimes between circuits, but there's a Supreme Court to resolve circuit "splits". [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
As I and others have observed, SA says nothing in his leaked opinion about rape and incest victims, even though the Mississippi statute the Court will almost certainly be upholding in the next few weeks contains no rape or incest exception to the ban. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
The lawfirm defendants argue that the Dallas Court of Appeal's decision conflicts with decisions of other courts of appeals, with its own precedent, and with a Texas Supreme Court case that stands for the proposition that the estoppel doctrine applies to all voidable contracts. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:07 pm
Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant's argument that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the convictions of murder in the second degree under Penal Law § 125.25(2) and assault in the first degree under Penal Law § 120.10(3), crimes which require proof of depraved indifference, is preserved for appellate review. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:08 pm
" Nevertheless, in the Citigroup case, Chancellor Chandler held, "there is a reasonable doubt as to whether the letter agreement [containing CEO Charles Prince's retirement package] meets the admittedly stringent 'so one sided' standard or whether the letter agreement awarded compensation that is beyond the 'outer limit' described by the Delaware Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:41 pm
Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am
The tale of judge against former judge, not to mention judges behaving badly, all about whether Queens Acting Supreme Court Justice Joel Blumenfeld is permitted to consider the ethics of former Judge, now Queens District Attorney, Richard Brown's scheme to add his own spin right to Miranda warning right before arraignment and provision of counsel, is over. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:44 pm
In 2003, Scheibenberger's Superior Court colleagues strongly urged him to receive inpatient treatment for alcohol abuse after an incident at a local tavern. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 7:37 am
After graduation she clerked for a Georgia Supreme Court Justice, then moved on to the Georgia Attorney General's office. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
“The Supreme Court has defined a ‘prevailing party’ as one who has ‘prevailed on the merits of at least some claims. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:07 am
It's the gruesome Karl case where, according to Hartman, "the supreme court of appeals mentioned and parted company with the substantial majority of other state courts that had addressed the issue as well as with Ashworth and other decisions predicting West Virginia would adopt the learned intermediary doctrine generally. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank's weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet.Highlights this week included:briefs filed in the US Supreme Court in an effort to revive the doctrine of patent exhaustion and another positive step towards a single European patent litigation system. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:23 am
Supreme Court intervene in Hood's case and grant him a new trial with an impartial judge and an ethical prosecutor. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:39 pm
" It was long, long after the Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Brown v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court's jurisprudence on the First Amendment dates back to only a little more than a century ago. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:43 pm
Today, reasons for judgement were released by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, discussing the purpose of Rule 37B in Personal Injury Litigation. [read post]
