Search for: "Taylor v. State"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 3,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
In simple terms, the government cannot take your land and then decide later what to do with it without running afoul of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.Absent “urban blight,” or other exceptions which weren’t present here, the AD4 annulled the Town’s efforts to acquire the Mall property and awarded the owner its fees and costs.Not that’s a condemnation if… [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 7:00 am
The Taylor Decision – YES Following Coutinho, the Taylor v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:38 am
On Thursday, August 20, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court granted a motion for reconsideration in McCormick v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:18 am
In effect, Jardim alleged that he had been disciplined for performing “protected activities” within the meaning of the Taylor Law -- an unfair labor practice. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
& Taylor Rest. v New York State Liq. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:47 am
In Connecticut State Dental v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 12:03 am
[www.nytimes.com] February 11, 2007 The Needle and the Damage Done By ELIZABETH WEIL On a warm spring day last June in Kansas City, a doctor identified only as John Doe No. 1 sat behind a screen to testify in the case of Michael Anthony Taylor v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:11 pm
The petition of the day is: Taylor v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:27 pm
& Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 6:33 am
Taylor, 529 U. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:25 am
’” In re Taylor, 158 N.J. 644, 656 (1999) (quoting State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Jacob and Brae V. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:57 am
Taylor, Student Director, Dustin J. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am
–Taylor v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
LEXIS 4559, at 20-21.With regard to the “identity of parties” requirement, the Court extended its "virtual representation" analysis in in Taylor v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:25 am
The title -- "IP in 2015 - Where we are v Where I thought we'd be" -- is broad enough to suit all tastes and a multiplicity of interpretations. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, which upheld the act. [read post]
