Search for: "Taylor v. United States" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2018, 8:28 am by Ben
In the wake of the Blurred Lines decision, and the more recent Taylor [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:39 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts: RG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and North Wiltshire District Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 198 (AAC) (05 May 2011): Failure to provide family with enough housing benefit to give disabled daughters separate bedrooms not breach of human rights Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors v The Legal Services Commission [2011] EWHC 1323 (Admin) (25 May 2011): Immigration solicitor fails in challenge to Legal Aid contract – “sad” but could have… [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
United States The Atlantic had a piece “The True Danger of the Trump Campaign’s Defamation Lawsuits”. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am by Oscar Davies and Jack Castle
In R (on the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 56, [2021] All ER (D) 53 (Dec), the Supreme Court found there was no positive obligation on the state to provide the option of an ‘X’ gender category on passports. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
You see, as of yesterday at 11:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time, I officially became the co-coordinator of the Plaintiffs’ Employment Panel for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
You see, as of yesterday at 11:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time, I officially became the co-coordinator of the Plaintiffs’ Employment Panel for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am by Ronald Collins
Press Oct., 2013) Katrina Kimport, Queering Marriage: Challenging Family Formation in the United States (Rutgers U. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:52 pm
American Standard, Inc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 56, and Saul Alinksy's brief discussion of the recent California decision in Taylor v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am by Schachtman
United States Envt’l Protection Agency, 4 F.Supp.2d 435 (M.D.N.C. 1998), vacated by, 313 F.3d 852 (4th Cir. 2002) Tocolytics – Medical Malpractice Hurd v. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 9:37 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So this brings up two central questions: First, is it true that a Herculean justice, seeking unequivocal “right answers” to the questions posed by the United States Constitution, will feel forced by her oath of office to recognize a strong protection for the “right to keep and bear arms”? [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm by Steve Kalar
A slow week in the Ninth (for non-capital cases, at least), and an order amending the opinion, gives us an excuse to go back for a second pass at the interesting decision and sentencing issues in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]