Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 55,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2016, 2:35 pm
In Ghiselli v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
In People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:50 pm
Most people may be familiar with the term "common law marriage. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:11 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:02 am
But in the world we actually live in, no one is sure what the law is, and people developing these kinds of creative works need to be constantly worrying about possible legal problems.Read it here. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 12:44 pm
The Arizona Court of Appeals in the case of Amadore v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 9:08 am
Here: The National Indian Law Library added new content to the Indian Law Bulletins on 9/12/19. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:19 pm
Bryant appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm
Nevertheless, it isn’t – unfortunately – a new Cotton Field.Filed under: Gender Issues, International Human Rights Law, IntLawGrrls, Latin America and the Caribbean, Public International Law, Women's Rights Law [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
" (People v Bergerson, 17 NY2d 398, 401 [1966]). [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:40 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
I told you he meant the people outside. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:48 pm
So, pursuant to California law, in 2022 he filed a motion to withdraw his plea, on the theory that he wouldn't have pled guilty if he knew he was subject to being deported as a result.The prosecution didn't oppose his motion, but the trial court denied it anyway. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Opti v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 10:04 pm
Woolums v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:17 pm
Here: The National Indian Law Library added new content to the Indian Law Bulletins on 1/6/17. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:23 pm
(I say all this, by the way, having no connection whatsoever to the situation out there other than knowing a few students who are Riverside ADAs, previously working with someone (Hal Hopp) who's now a Riverside judge, and the fact that the Riverside DA is a USD Law graduate from way back. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:34 pm
There are few opinions that you'll have occasion to employ in your everyday life, but this is one of them.I always assumed it was the law that you have to use your turn signal whenever you're turning. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
Given those facts, he could (and did) plausibly argue that his threats were no "so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat" as required by California law to support a criminal threat conviction.But then all I have to tell you are the background facts. [read post]
