Search for: "Thomas Connor"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
Justice Thomas, as well as then-Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice O'Connor, stuck to their federalism guns. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:47 pm
Stenberg, 505 U.S. at 1019-20 (Thomas, J., joined by Rehnquist, C.J. and Scalia, J. dissenting). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:06 pm
" (p. 1).In addition, since the departure of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, Justice Kennedy evidently stepped into her shoes as the "swing vote. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:20 pm
Thomas. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:13 pm
I guess Kennedy really is the new swing vote, as I and so many others predicted when O'Connor stepped down. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:12 am
" "The replacement of moderate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor with ultraconservative Justice Samuel Alito has brought the Court to the brink of judicial disaster. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
[By the way: Justice Thomas in his concurrence suggests that he might have voted to invalidate the statute if a Commerce Clause challenge had been raised. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Thomas filed a separate dissent. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:53 am
US; - Marty has this post regarding the effect of Justice O'Connor's retirement; - *UPDATED 7:55 PM: Gretchen collects news reports here, while Jason collects blog posts from around the web here; and - The opinions for today are available here. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
[By the way: Justice Thomas in his concurrence suggests that he might have voted to invalidate the statute if a Commerce Clause challenge had been raised. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:30 pm
, at 512 (O'Connor, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) ("It is not certain that an agency regulation determining the pre-emptive effect of any federal statute is entitled to deference"). [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:58 am
Officials could no longer justify the cost of an appeal against Mr Thomas's public interest ruling that details could be revealed about a 10-year-old policy. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 8:40 am
Justice Thomas' brief, seven-page majority's opinion just reinforces the strict definition of the "clearly established" requirement that has been around since Justice O'Connor's opinion in Williams v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 7:02 am
Provided for consideration are several simple question/statements shared by Craig Roy, Sharon Nelson, and Thomas O'Connor during a discussion roundtable on Every Day Electronic Discovery during Friday's ABA TECHSHOW breakout sessions. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 10:17 am
Now, I am a big fan of Justice Thomas and not a fan at all of Justice O'Connor, so I am happy to believe that Justice O'Connor was motivated by pettiness in articulating constitutional doctrine. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 4:13 pm
If you are one of those people who lumps everyone that's to the Right of Justice O'Connor into one big pile, then you need to read this section. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:55 pm
" The audience, obviously well-versed in Lane, roared.The most touching remarks of the day were delivered by Justice Thomas, who administered the oath of office to Judge Ryan. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:44 pm
Respectfully, I part company with Judge Thomas on this one. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 9:50 am
Thomas dissenting from today's ruling of the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:40 am
Id. at 2301 (Thomas, J., dissenting). [read post]
