Search for: "U.S. v. American Insurance Company" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A Fellow in the American College of Employee Benefit Counsel, the American Bar Foundation and the Texas Bar Foundation, Ms. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm by Bruce Zagaris
On international asset recovery Zagaris covered the agreement by the U.S., Jersey, and Nigeria to repatriate more than $300 million of stolen Abacha funds to Nigeria as well as the U.S. returning $300 million to Malaysia in the 1MDB case, the Portuguese court’s seizure of Isabel dos Santos’ shares in a telecom firm in connection with the Angolan corruption investigation, and the Swiss freeze of $900 million from the former head of the Angolan… [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm by Bruce Zagaris
On international asset recovery Zagaris covered the agreement by the U.S., Jersey, and Nigeria to repatriate more than $300 million of stolen Abacha funds to Nigeria as well as the U.S. returning $300 million to Malaysia in the 1MDB case, the Portuguese court’s seizure of Isabel dos Santos’ shares in a telecom firm in connection with the Angolan corruption investigation, and the Swiss freeze of $900 million from the former head of the Angolan… [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
The claim arose out of two articles published by the Insurance Times on its website which a personal injury law firm, Bond Turner, and a post-accident assistance vehicle company, Direct Accident Management Limited, alleged to be defamatory. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Ryan P. Phair and Carter C. Simpson
The court held that the complaint failed to allege plausible harm because “[v]isitors to [the company’s] website are presented with the shipping and handling charges” during the checkout process, and because consumers unsatisfied with the S&H fees were “free to make their purchases elsewhere. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Ryan P. Phair
The court held that the complaint failed to allege plausible harm because “[v]isitors to [the company’s] website are presented with the shipping and handling charges” during the checkout process, and because consumers unsatisfied with the S&H fees were “free to make their purchases elsewhere. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
And Fox surely tempers its various legal risks related to the uncertainties of multistate libel law with insurance, which is also a cost. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am by Amy Howe
Fourteen years later, Breyer joined Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion for the majority in American Legion v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Reflections on the Citizens United Case: The Internet is awash with instant analysis from the commentariat about the U.S. [read post]