Search for: "US DEPT JUSTICE" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Baraby, 250 A.D.2d 201, 681 N.Y.S.2d 826 (3rd Dept. 1998). [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:40 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Many of us can think of examples in our practice where shareholder derivative plaintiffs have faced countersuit against direct claims. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:24 pm
She has devoted much of her career to bettering the juvenile justice system including by managing the Miami Halfway House and as a participant in the Dept of Juvenile Justice’s Quality Assurance Program. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by Melissa Milewski
At the same time, she asserted her legal rights and her ideas of economic justice. [read post]
10 Aug 2024, 12:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
., decided last week by Justice Robert Hettleman of the New York Family Court (Kings County): [The Administration for Children's Services (ACS)] has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Ms. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Justice Catterson's Majority Opinion The majority opinion, authored by Associate Justice James M. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:24 am by Peter J. Sluka
  It owned Nite Cap, which the members used recreationally, often sailing it together. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Bench Trial, Post-Trial Findings, and Judgment The parties proceeded to a bench trial before Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Timothy S. [read post]
An extensive dissent in De Vita, authored by Justice Arabian and joined by Justice Baxter, would have held general plan amendments per se to be matters of fundamental statewide importance, exhibiting genuine extra-municipal concerns, and requiring multi-disciplinary planning expertise in their legislation – and that therefore they are matters  beyond the local initiative power. [read post]
An extensive dissent in De Vita, authored by Justice Arabian and joined by Justice Baxter, would have held general plan amendments per se to be matters of fundamental statewide importance, exhibiting genuine extra-municipal concerns, and requiring multi-disciplinary planning expertise in their legislation – and that therefore they are matters  beyond the local initiative power. [read post]