Search for: "US v. Crawford" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2007, 9:12 am
Stay tuned as one of our voting rights cases comes before the Supreme Court: Crawford v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 7:48 am
Box 308 Yorktown, IN 47396 Phone: (800) 589-1121 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.area6.org Bureau of Aging and In-Home Services 402 West Washington Street, E-431 Indianapolis, IN 46207 Phone: (317) 232-7020; (800) 352-4800 (Toll Free) Fax: (317) 233-3475 Web: http://www.state.in.us/fssa/elderly/aging/index.html AARP Indiana One North Capitol Avenue, Suite 1275 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2025 Phone: (317) 423-2277 Fax: (317) 423-2211 or 2299 E-mail: inaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgstates/in … [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 7:47 am
U.S. (06-1509) — taxation on diversion of corporate funds to shareholder of a firm that has no profits Wednesday, Jan. 9 Crawford v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
Below you will find the Pennsylvania UCP affiliates: UCP of Pennsylvania 1902 Market Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 761-6129; (866) 761-6129 (Toll Free) Fax: (717) 761-2534 E-mail: info@ucpofpa.org Web: http://www.ucpofpa.org UCP Central PA 44 South 38th Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 975-0611 Fax: (717) 975-0839 E-mail: kidscenter@ucpcentralpa.org Web: http://www.ucpcentralpa.org Administrative Office/Alternatives West 925 Linda Lane Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717)… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Crawford, No. 05-4173-CV-C, 2006WL 1779035 (W.D. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
"Crawford overruled the near-quarter century old Ohio v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 7:52 pm
There will likely be no additional executions by lethal injection until at least after oral arguments & conference in Baze v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 2:09 pm
There will likely be no additional executions by lethal injection until at least after oral arguments & conference in Baze v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Proctor, No. 07-60011"Defendant's conviction for theft of a firearm, possession of a stolen firearm, and felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed over claims that the indictment should have been dismissed based on unnecessary delay, and that the district court's admission of a 911 tape-recording violated his right of confrontation under Crawford. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 2:13 pm
And, not surprisingly, one state court decision looked to CAAF precedent for guidance in interpreting Crawford v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:29 pm
So that is a measure of how far matters have progressed from the pre-Crawford era, and perhaps the immediate post-Crawford era as well.In State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:26 pm
That practice grew up before Crawford, but after the Supreme Court’s 1980 ruling in Ohio v. [read post]