Search for: "United States v. Harris"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
By way of rejoinder, the United States insisted that the parties had not relied upon the documents, before the lower court or in their appeals briefing. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
Many people excluded from the United States because of the Muslim ban, such as those who received a once-in-a-lifetime immigration visa via the “diversity lottery,” have still not been admitted. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:37 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 4:31 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 11:57 am
The Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:59 pm
Staples v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:12 pm
”) United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
At The Hill’s Congress Blog, Ilya Shapiro looks ahead to the upcoming decision in Harris v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:41 pm
Harry Reid (D-Nev.) [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
In Godoy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:11 pm
(“Defendants”), in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for infringement of U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
By contrast, Benesh noted that every time a United States President makes a big decision, it eats away at his public approval rating. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
- Minneapolis lawyer Dan Kelly of Winthrop & Weinstine on the firm's Duets Blog Ten Reasons Chinese Companies Fail In The United States. - Seattle attorney Dan Harris of Harris & Moure on the firm's China Law Blog [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
State legislatures, we [have] pointed out, performed an ‘electoral’ function ‘in the choice of United States Senators under Article I, section 3, prior to the adoption of the Seventeenth Amendment,’ a ‘ratifying’ function for “proposed amendments to the Constitution under Article V,’ as explained in Hawke v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
Thus, the court denied cert in Harris v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am
The United States also showed its support for Ecuador’s democratic progress with visits by U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:29 pm
The presentation will include a review of the federal court litigation filed in Seattle that eventually led to the United States Supreme Court 2006 landmark Hamdan v. [read post]
