Search for: "United States v. Price" Results 1121 - 1140 of 5,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2013, 10:32 am by James Hamilton
One obvious provision is Section 604, which amends the Bank Holding Company Act to direct the Federal Reserve to consider, when it evaluates an application for approval of a proposed acquisition, merger, or consolidation, whether it would result in greater or more concentrated risks to the stability of the United States banking or financial system. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
Issue: (1) Whether a cartel’s delivery of price-fixed goods overseas for incorporation into finished products imported directly to the United States is immune from private suit under U.S. antitrust law; and (2) whether, absent special circumstances, a motions panel may assign itself to decide the merits of a case. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by admin
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether federal law prohibiting discrimination in the workplace applies to gay and transgender employees. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
March 28, 2024. [4] 4 Statement of Interest of the United States at 3, Cornish-Adebiyi v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
Moreover, in his opinion, these types of lawsuit violated rights guaranteed by the United States and North Carolina constitutions. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:37 pm by Liskow & Lewis
 Further, the price could have been affected by the BTU of the gas and the BTU was not stated on the royalty statements. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  It did the same thing back in 2007 in State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently granted a defendant’s motion to decertify a class because plaintiff’s damages model was not consistent with his theory of liability as required by the Supreme Court in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 3:08 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  The case involves the doctrine of First Sale in the United States, which underlies library lending and also allows consumers to buy and sell used books, DVDs, etc. [read post]